- KABY LAKE VMWARE FUSION 10 UPGRADE
- KABY LAKE VMWARE FUSION 10 PRO
- KABY LAKE VMWARE FUSION 10 SOFTWARE
So my only recourse for now is to downgrade all the images to the View Agent 6.2.2 which seems to work ok, but I would prefer finding the actual issue instead if anyone else has experienced this. Taskbar is either incomplete or unclickable most of the time. Please wait for this to complete before trying again".Īfter another 20-30 seconds, we can try again and it will bring us to the desktop,but 50% of the time, it is unusable. Once a user logs in, we get a black screen for approximately 15-20 seconds, and then a kick out back to the desktop(Zeroclient or View Client have the same result).When we try again we get the following message from the client "The View agent reports that you have an existing desktop session request that is currently being processed. Our vGPU environment is simply unusable at this time, at least any pool running the latest agents. weird lock files when recomposing our images, composer errors stating vmx files not being found during recompose or refresh, but this latest one is actually more severe.
KABY LAKE VMWARE FUSION 10 UPGRADE
Horizon View 7.2(Connection,Composer,Security)īasically as the title says, since our upgrade to the latest versions, we've had heeps of issues. Maybe I'll try some more later in the week, but right now I've got to give up and get some work done.
KABY LAKE VMWARE FUSION 10 SOFTWARE
I use Linux, Windows, and Mac guests with software like Docker (which requires virtualization, for example) and Xcode (which provides profiling within MacOS, for example), among other dev tools.
KABY LAKE VMWARE FUSION 10 PRO
I use VMware Fusion Pro 8 to run multiple development environments for the work I do. On the other hand, if what you need is simply virtualization capabilities inside the VM, you would not need the "code profiling" enabled. It looks like VMware Workstation/Fusion don't have that capability (and what we're trying to do manually here isn't supported by VMware, sigh).Īt this point, I guess I need to go back to my old computer, argh, and wait for VMware to do updates for the new processor.
This has been a very interesting learning experience! In ESXi, admins can set mask values through the interface for exactly this kind of thing: when a new host processor messes up the VM's needs. One way to confirm from the log whether the CPUID signature masking is successful is to look for the respective processor code names: Skylake, Broadwell, Crystal Well. Sadly, that didn't work at all, and I wasn't able to find the correct keyword, if it even still exists for VMWare Workstation/Fusion.) (I saw another of your posts mentioning `cpuidMask`. I really need to be able to change the host. However, as you noted, this is changing the guest, not the host. It does seem that it's just a matter of determining which bits to turn on to match the capabilities. And, right, the Skylake and Broadwell options didn't work either. I played around with it all day, but didn't find any combination that solves both problems. Those values start out looking okay, but then give me a `guestRequiresAVX2noAVX` message. I use Textmate 2.0, an editor for programmers.
(For example: typing "cpuid", it would change it to "cupid"). The potential gotchas with using TextEdit to edit the vmx is the "Smart Quotes" and automatic text replacements. Just have to make sure that the VM is powered off/not suspended before you edit the Config File.
0 kommentar(er)
